Monday, March 19, 2012

Class Discussion for 3.13


In class today we focused on the question “What makes art political?” In books and films, often how the characters are portrayed (their beliefs and ideas and also the settings and situations the characters are put in and how they react and deal to them) are what makes the work political. Arts have the opportunity to make their political statements very subtle ways or in outright ways, though subtlety is much less likely to be censored.
Censorship in itself is interesting because it often does the opposite of what it’s supposed to. When something is censored, it is even more popular. Czechoslovakia was very pro-censorship. This gave some art a political meaning, even when the artist did not intend it to be political or the viewers do not see it as political. This makes Communist Czechoslovakia (the censor-ers) their own worst enemy.

I think The Joke is both art with political content and art given a political meaning because of its content. Kundera is interested in humanity and relationships and moral development and his characters just happen to be in political situations, which would suggest that it is given a political meaning after the fact. But The Joke also has political content, as seen through Ludvik leading a bourgeois lifestyle even under Communism and poking fun at the “Baptism” and therefore mocking the regime. It’s political because it’s critical of the current political situation.

We then moved on the truth in art. In this case The Joke, a fictional novel, can still have truth. While characters and situations can be fictional, made-up, the characters’ feelings and reactions can be true in the sense that people Trudy do react and feel that way and can relate. Simply, it represents life the way it is.

Finally we talked about the truth in music. This left me with a question:

If a musical piece has no lyrics, can it still inspire the truth?

No comments:

Post a Comment